explicit argument based on citizens united that was rejected by that lower court. they basically said, look, the supreme court handed down citizens united, i don't zee how you can draw a line between those first amendment rights and these as well. >> and the 10th circuit said just the opposite, that it's a continuing line. the supreme court is going to have to sort this out. there are a lot of legal scholars here on this question who don't think it all hinges on citizens united. the judge who wrote the 10th circuit decision thought that it did. citizens united is not the only time that courts have ever said that corporations can exercise what are in essence, individual rights. some they have, some they don't. joining me now, former georgetown law student, famously denied her a chance to testify at their house hearing for birth control.