very careful. they spent five days. last week they asked the judge for particular instructions. they asked for instruction of whether they have to be unanimous as to the racketeering acts, the individual acts. now we know from the verdict that, in fact, they were. eight of the murders the jury found not proven. that's not guilty. it means not proven. another 11 they found absolutely proven beyond a reasonable doubt. so you have a jury who over the period of four or five days carefully sifted the evidence, asked the judge for detailed instructions on this kind of -- on liability and particularly what they needed to find. i think as you go through the verdict sheet and go through the verdict, you will find that they probably looked to see where an individual witness may have been the only evidence or where that witness was corroborated by a