and as you know, the law is clear. you're not entitled to -- you're entitled to representation from your community. but that does not mean that let's say if i'm on trial, i can demand that there be black people on the jury, or if i were asian, that there be asian people on the jury. you just have to have a fair pool. i think it's really interesting that they all settled upon, and both sides using their challenges, this pool of women to be the jurors. and i'm really interested to see what the dynamic is of having a jury made up of just women when they evaluate this evidence, when they look at the testimony, how they're going to rule, and what that means that they're all women as they're in that room interacting with each other and communicating. that's going to be really interesting to me afterwards, presuming some of them will talk with us. >> tad nelson, if this were a case that you were prosecuting, would you have been happy with an all female jury? >> well, you know, it's a double-edged sword. yeah, i think overall, i wouldn't have had a huge problem with. and here is why. i mean, we all know that five of