under the facts of that case. before i get there, let me point out the entire thing i just heard is we don't think that the witness was credible or we gont think that the jury should draw a certain inference. but mr. west hasn't said yet that those aren't facts in a aren't before the jury and that the inference is not permissible. i understand he doesn't think they're the right ones, but that's not a reason not to give an instruction. the instruction is what are facts before the jury and what are at least some reasonable enfe inferences to draw. when a person admits to following an individual and when a person says let go, get off, and is in fear of this other person who is it following, w4e7b there is evidence physically of a physical struggle between them, there is evidence that the defendant is the provoker especially when he admits that he was pursuing both