very flexible and not as brittle as what the critics say and the reason why you have to go to a military system or something like that. the supreme court in 1984 in new york versus quarles says there was a broad public safety exception in cases of imminent threat. and this is if there is ever going to be an exemption that qualifies, this is that type of one. and the administration, you know, i think it's important to say, wisely i think, you know, said they got their interrogation, they did what they needed to do. now they have read him his rights and the trial can proceed in the way that trials do all the time. as you were saying in your set piece a few minutes ago, this is the way we do things in this country. justice comes to you, even if you're in a hospital bed. we don't need to send you to guantanamo, boston bomber, in order to try you. we have the tools, the techniques, the prosecutors and everything we need right here 20 do it. >> neal katyal at georgetown university law school, thank you very much for your time tonight. you are exactly the guy i wanted to talk to. i appreciate it. >> thank you very much. >> i will say in terms of that public safety exemption to the