social infrastructure issues. it can't just be money toward the brain, we also have to invest in the infrastructure of brain disease. >> for me on the nsf piece, i just saw nsf through the coburn amendment take all of the money for nsf for political science funding. at the same time we're talking about nsf and nih going on the brain. i'm down for stem, this science -- >> i think it's confusing. i think what jonathan said is important. you can data form and map what you want. but nurturing the next einstein is going to take more than a gps of the brain device. in terms of the public perception, it's super confusing. how can the sequester take $10 billion from american science and then suddenly there's this $100 million or $3 billion down the road money for mapping the brain. i hate to be the cynic here but what i see is that picture you