their parents to have full recognition and full status. the voice of those children is important in this case, don't you think? >> as the court considered the potential hazards of gay marriage, it took up the issue of whether same-sex marriages actually cause harm to heterosexual married couples. >> what harm you see happening and when and how and what -- what harm to the institution of marriage or to opposite sex couples, how does this cause and effect work? >> once again, i -- i would reiterate that we don't believe that's the correct legal question before the court. and that the correct question is whether or not redefining marriage to include same-sex couples would advance the interests of marriage as it were. >> are you conceding the point