exist. they're engaged in massive resistance so they want the governors to do nothing. on the other hand, the insurance companies, who are much more sophisticated and the hospitals, they would much rather have the states run these exchanges because they believe in general, not all of the time, they will get a better deal from the states. the states will be more solicitous. the states will not standardize benefit packages and make comparisons. ironically, they want the governors and the states to elect to do the state exchange. the other part of the constituency, the tea party people, they just want the state to do nothing and allow the federal government to do it. >> congressman, why this way of writing the law that still gives so much of the power to states when we knew that they were going to be recalcitrant in i am plemtation? >> this represented a compromise. those are us who wanted