could go back to the court if this is enforced in a way that people feel violates their fourth amendment rights. >> if it starts to get accusations of racial profiling, is it a game changer? >> well, certainly that in a legal sense, that's what the courts are going to be looking out for. that is why arizona and the others have to interpret this very narrowly and be very careful about it. certainly as a political matter, you can see in mitt romney's reticence to combo, out and speak publicly about, they wants to keep this law at arm's length. you can sort of see the tide has shifted here a bit away from the immigration hard liners, both in terms of the court around in terms of what romney's been saying. >> well, he did issue a statement. he said, this has become a muddle, let me read more from the statement that he released that you talked about, dana. "i would have preferred to see the supreme court give more latitude to the states, not less." but i wonder if nothing else, we talked about a legal ramifications but politically,