they wanted to get somebody for it. so they bring this guy to trial, and i wonder whether the jury had that problem executing the guy with nine witnesses? nine witnesses, the guy is there, he's one of the two people, and then he has a gun that was apparently used in a crime earlier that night, the shell casings match, conviction. then all these year later we go back and look at the case and say, well, the evidence has evaporated. this is a hard one. >> it is a hard one. i've seen nothing that would lead me to believe this was an improper prosecution. i don't think there was anything wrong done by the prosecution. he proceeded in good faith through the norm at course of trial down there. there was some evidence in a case, but as barry indicated earlier, the primarily