>> because some counts may be proven against one defendant does not mean that all counts will be proven beyond a reasonable doubt against both defendants. >> and it became clear that the defense strategy was to point the finger at the other brother. jonathan carr's lawyer argued that neither andy schreiber, the carjack victim or ann walenta who survived long enough to talk to police, identified him as the second assailant and no physical evidence connected him to either crime. >> the only evidence connecting jonathan carr is the simple fact that he is the brother of the co-defendant reginald carr. only guilt by association. >> jonathan carr's lawyers called no witnesses. their only evidence, an unused train ticket to cleveland, ohio, good for the night of the murders. >> he was actually supposed to leave very early during the morning hours of december 15th, 2000. he was supposed to board an