out what the scenarios could look like if the waters, in fact, did rise to 110 feet -- 1,010 feet or 1,014 feet. i would feel much more assured if they would lay out the various scenarios for us and not just trying to reassure us there is nothing going on here, move along. >> when the nrc says, as you say, the river levels are going to be at a place where the plant should be able to deal with it, that's what we're hearing from the nrc chairman, what do you think they really are most concerned about? what do you think is the most pressing worry for ft. calhoun? >> there are two worries. and one is that there could be damage to the dams upstream, the ft. peck dam, for example, is -- certain concerns that could break. if that broke, you would have substantially higher water damage. and we don't know what would happen to the plant. we have never had a situation like this, as you said. we have never had a u.s. nuclear plant flooded the way this one is. we don't know what would happen