continuing resolution. first of all, there is a lot of gimmickry in this continuing resolution because a fair amount of the money being saved are called rescissions which is money not spent anyway so the sense is we're returning money back to the treasury because it didn't spend all the money allotted, etcetera. but if you're going to make an argument from the most extreme libertarian perspective there are a few things you have to conceive of as basic public goods and things like tsunami warning systems, early warning systems for seismic events are clearly public good. even in the most kind of stripped down conception of a real kind of night watchman state, those are things you want the government doing. and in the general context of the federal budget do not cost that much money. let's keep in mind that the entire defense portion of the budget and the earmarks therein, there are more earmarks in the bill than any other bill have all been protected by the house republicans. >> it is basic safety for american citizens they're talking about jeopardizing.