but for example, on the summer school thing, let's eliminate that. that will save us some money, but the core functions of the program are sustained. that's how we're approaching all of these cuts. on the liheap program, the home heating assistance program, we doubled the home heating assistance program when i came into office in part because there was a huge energy spike. and so folks, if we had just kept it at the same level, folks would have been in real trouble. energy prices have now gone down, but the costs of the program have stayed the same. so what we've said is, well, let's go back to a more sustainable level. if it turns out that once again you see a huge energy spike, then we can revisit it. but let's not just assume because it's at a $5 billion level that each year we're going to sustain it at a $5 billion