comparemela.com

between $200 billion and $300 billion more over the next two to three years, that's not in this bill anywhere. it's going to cost over $100 billion to run the programs that the bill sets up over the next ten years. that's not in here. some things are left out. there are lots of gains with timing. you frontload the bill with taxes and have ten years of taxes with only six years of spending, it makes it look like it add up, but it doesn't. >> let me pick up on that because i think the response to that or counterargument to that allegation is that, yes, as a practical matter we can start collecting the revenue immediately. but the savings don't kick in until later. but the bottom line, the real measure of it is does it affect the deficit in the first ten years, and the second ten years, and they say by that measure it does. >> but they've left out well over $300 billion worth of costs. it's only supposed to save $138 billion. so i don't think they can even make that case. and there's a lot of robbing peter to pay paul in this bill. that's important. >> let's break there down. you say social security income, they're counting on -- more

Related Keywords

Couldnt Pass It ,Things ,Programs ,Anywhere ,Lots ,Ten ,200 Billion ,300 Billion ,100 Billion ,Three ,00 Billion ,Two ,Spending ,Matter ,Taxes ,Yes ,Response ,It Add Up ,Allegation ,It Doesn T ,Counterargument ,Gains ,Timing ,Six ,Bottom Line ,Deficit ,Revenue ,Savings Dont Kick ,Lot ,Case ,Costs ,Social Security Income ,Robbing Peter ,38 Billion ,138 Billion ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.