that obviously is not what the law currently state so i think it's a little bit of a problem. >> shannon: let's go to exhibit c. this is another one of the claimants in the case, a group of clergy and they say they are focused on communities, the welfare of the african-american community in indianapolis. they say if the benefits are terminated that people in the communities we serve a going to be unable to cover basic living expenses such as housing, utilities, food health care and child care. ethan. >> there is a powerful public policy argument on behalf of the plaintiffs. it's an extremely synthetic case but i think it turns on the second sentence of the statute which vest the power in the department of workforce development. they have decided not to continue the benefits. >> shannon: bob, strong