currently dwells, et cetera, et cetera. i mean, of all the divides in the country, i think you could probably make a pretty interesting case that there is a fisher running through the expectation of what happens when we elevate safety and feelings to a level of privacy? i think it creates an realistic net an a real disconnect. >> tucker: are you saying that safety is not the most important thing ever? >> mike: i'm saying that everybody wants to go home safe at the end of the day. safety always would be a delightful bromide, a wise platitude. safety first is the stuff of idiocy. it allows us to begin to believe that somebody other than us might care more about our well-being than we do. the minute we buy into that nonsense, we embrace the warm grip of complacency. no, safety is not the enemy.