the government wants life, liberty or property from a person, there has to be a trial. so if the fetus in the womb is a person, no legal abortion could happen because you you would have to prove that somehow the fetus in the womb did something wrong. for that reason as horrific as this logic is roe v. wade has said a fetus is not a person. that's why regrettably this courageous move by this alabama judge will eventually be overturned. >> but roe v. wade is wrong in the definition of a person because if a child is born, you know, children are born all the time a month two, months prematurely and they're a person. isn't it wrong? judge: i agree with you. but roe v. wade until it is interfered with by the court supreme court court law of the land. i have been arguing that the fetus in the womb is a person. the fetus has human parents and all the human genome necessary to actualize into