question, i don't view the issue in the independent counsel statute and the morrison v. olson as dealing with a long passed statue and a an obscure not relevant issue. the reason you reached out and volunteered that you loved to overturn morrison v. olson isn't because scalia wrote a powerful and moving dissent. it's because of a view of the executive branch having all of the power of the executive branch in the president's hands that you have articulated across speeches, interviews, writings and opinion. an opinion this year. that's really your view of the executive branch. >> i've not -- i've never said that. i've never said that, number 1. they're two issues here. i want to be very clear on them so people understand that, too. >> this is how i read your dissent in phh this year, arguing, advance ago unitary executive theory. >> and i refer to a single president.