agreement. i was for a new nafta agreement, we needed upgraded. it is almost 25 years old. but we also don't want to have no nafta, because the biggest trading partner is ohio and other states. we do have lower tariffs and other countries as a result of some of those agreement. >> neil: in "the wall street journal" today, saying this trade agreement with mexico is actually worse than it presumably will replace before did you make of that? >> at the beginning of the editorial, they said it is half-and-half. have good and half not direct so good. there are some great things there opening up the market for mexico among others. really good stuff along intellectual property. and also stuff along biologicals, to have a longer period. there are some good things in there for the united states and our workers and our farmers. but, the sunset provision has been a concern of "the wall street journal" and mine. the second is this arbitration panel for investors.