would you want a person who says casually accuse people of murder without evidence to get a security clearance equipmentus obviously you wouldn't. brennan is not different. an effort to suppress freedom of speech, but brennan is the one who believes words alone, speech, or a form of treason that should get you sent to prison. or executed. that is unhinged. the government is belatedly acknowledging that. i lou dobbs, what would be the reason -- can you think of a legitimate reason for john brennan to have to retain his security clearance after leaving the government for punditry? >> i can't imagine why that would be necessary, or why it would be frankly allowed. after his first personal -- again, personal. not policy attacks, personally p attacks against the president of the united states and what we now suspect is a john brennan inspired and led assault on this president, an effort to subvert his campaign and hisis administration through the good