>> andrew: i think he could always do that down the road. but i think if they thought that michael cohen was the key to making a collusion case where there was a real concern to be doing espionage that there is no reason. >> melissa: what if it's a totally different crime? what if they're just looking for anything that would be a crime? >> harris: i do think any of us would be open to a crime but what we would be open to that has been this whole trap argument of if there's any point of inconsistency, but that look like flying and ending memory can force you to do that. a lot of things. i think that's where we may be laid bare with that. >> andrew: this has been the big objection to the investigation. at the beginning of the investigation, with a big objection to this has been is that in this country, was supposed to happen is we have a crime and then you assign a prosecutor. >> lisa: is the payment of crime, the origin of this with michael cohen? >> andrew: it could be. it's more likely that there is a high intent issue with these