only was he of no value but of negative value. people now have lost their jobs and agreat deal of money was waisted. most of the companies decided after the first meeting he wasn't going to be able to produce as represented. the question is what did he represent he would produce. did he represent something he knew he couldn't produce or just represent i can give you insight into the president's thinking because i used to be his lawyer for ten years and my office was two doors down from his. >> sounds like they are damming michael cohen after the fact. they now regret association with him. it's unfair to michael cohen and extremely unfair to the president. your thoughts in that regard he would have to investigate there