>> julie, they just wrapped up. i came out. as you would expect, there was discussion about whether the president's remarks when he was a candidate, whether that should factor in the ban. there were two bans. the third ban. they were all changed a little bit. the administration believed what they have now, the one being challenged here today, travel ban 3.0 has been tailored. they have added countries, taken them off. there's two, north korea and venezuela that have been added that are not muslim. that's been a question all along. the president has talked about muslim terrorists, the muslim ban idea. there was the question about whether the text of this ban now takes away those issues and whether you have to consider it on its face. most of the justices seem like they're interested in a holistic approach. where you're looking at everything the president has said. the other side arguing you can only go by the words. there's no religious animus there. justice alito asked if this is a