were told these are strict professionals. they're entitled to their opinions. we have an fbi agent who's supposed to be a counterintelligence guy squawking to his mistress, you know, about trump and opening himself up to all sorts of vulnerability to blackmail with an affair. of we've got andrew wiseman who, you know, applauded an obama holdover for defying a presidential order. we've got bruce orr, his wife is working for the people that produced the document. do you get the word professional when you read those actions? and it's, i think they're largely discrediting themselves. paul: but none of this, of course, relates to the credit, to the central question, dan, of collusion. >> yeah. paul: senator mark warner who is the ranking democrat on senate intelligence said this week that he thinks, actually, there's more fire than smoke, and he's not releasing any details, but he thinks this is the biggest thing he's ever going to do in his professional career. and he warned the president if you fire mueller, this is a