permanent. and this is what critics are saying. isn't a statement of your priorities? the real reason that you make the individual cuts, temporary, and then start after 2025, otherwise the deficit will be too big. it was going to go over some people say it is a budget gimmick but is it is a statement of priorities that you made the business cuts permanent and individual cuts temporary? we could have done exactly opposite and be the individual cuts permanent and cut back on the business cuts. >> chris, you cannot do that if you want to fix the business tax system. going from a worldwide system to a territorial system. you cannot switch back in 10 years. this is all about the byrd rule and how we calculate things. this is not about the deficit. because we think this is all about creating growth and we create economic growth to pay down the deficit. this is technical issues in the senate. the corporate site is about jobs. this is the tax cut and jobs