court. and getting a warrant to basically eavesdrop, tap, listen inin on conversations based on the document that was not only unverified -- as james comey said, by the way -- but ask this question, why was the fbi considering paying for it at some point in this process? that question has to be asked. i go back to this whole concept. something we've been talking about for a long time. if this dossier was a political creature, we now know it is -- "opposition research." if christopher steele was utilizing russian access to geto this information and then james comey said it was unverified and they went to court to get fisa warrants? you are raising a whole host of civil liberty issues. who knows what they did to the court. >> sean: it admissible in the court of law.ue >> i file motions to suppress the subpoenas in the document that resulted in that, probably.