keller until they got one and that they came into the newsroom and that it was the talk of the building. and i don't know the conversation was, but obviously they were not exchanging recipes. so, again, let me be clear. that doesn't mean that they swayed bill keller, the editor at the time, but, again, just my pointing outil "the new york times" doesn't like anybody to call them out on things. i get that. but it is true that that meeting happened, that both bill keller and the others said they have no recollection of it ever occurring. the meeting did occur, there was severe pressure, and all i know is that my story appeared without any reference to womeni or sexual anything at all. >> tucker: that's incredible. we should say, "the new york times" did attack you personally after you noted that your original story had been altered to take out all the interesting stuff.s" do you think it is possible -- rhetorical question here -- that you could forget a meeting with david boies and harvey weinstein in your own newsroom? >> that's an interesting