>> you can have a law that has a discriminatory impact and it can be upheld as long as there is no intent. what you have is an earlier version of the law that was thrown out the fifth circuit court of appeals implemented all of these new changes. the texas legislator adopted all of those changes and now you have this judge and still throwing up a lot, is not going to be held upon appeal. what you have is a law that simply says that a person who wants to cast a ballot nation show one of several forms of identification and if they can't, all they have to do is sign an affidavit and showing summing with their name and address on it. i have to show my idea when i purchase anything with a credit card. this is a guaranteed privilege and a right. >> heather: it seems to make common sense. kent, i don't understand why that would be discriminatory. >> jesse has a point, every u.s. citizen has a right to vote. they also, according to the constitution should not be