name it, spend like there's no tomorrow and try to buy off support. that's traditional washington. what i'm asking is something not traditional, separate the bills. greg: let me ask you this question, you're not for spending, you are for repeal, if you do this separately, you'll vote for the repeal bill and there's no question about that but when it comes to replacement part of it, where is your vote going to go? >> well, see my idea of replacement has always been replace it with freedom, replace it with choice, competition, expanded health savings account, buying groups, the association health plans that i've been pushing across state lines where you can join a bind group, that's my idea of replacement because it's funny back in january i was pushing repeal and replace because i thought republicans believed in replacing it with a marketplace, now i've discovered that at least half of my senate republican colleagues think replacement means replacement with obamacare alike with more federal spending and more federal programs, i'm not for that. i am for repeal and replace.