saying -- >> not at all. i think it's an overreaction and twisting what it sounded like he said to me. first of all, the media has been known to stoke fear. if all i did was watch the news, i wouldn't leave the house. they also glam rise occasionally villains. we saw that with the both many bomber on "rolling stone." if he's encouraging them to be responsible, what's wrong with that? >> wushl -- but commenting on whether people are fearful of another attack. it's no question that it feels like the press went way over on a few cases of ebola. >> i think you're job is to cover events truthfully, accurate lid, and nothing more. you can't listen to a president tell you to alter or shape your coverage. our role is to cover it as we see it. obviously the news has been