safer than we were then. do you agree? >> i do not. i do not. all of our enemies are emboldened. there's no chaos in the middle east and north africa than ever. we're empowering an enemy that we'll give more money to, the ability to buy advanced weapons and the ability to become a nuclear paw in ten to 15 years if they don't cheat. that's the biggest problem. we're not safer. we may be safer 16 months from now but not safe now. >> the argument is we'll be able to monitor and verify what they're doing. i was talking to ronald reagan -- one of his top former ambassadors who said ronald reagan would have entertained the deal but he was big on trusting and verifying. your fear is that we're not going to be able to verify this and hillary clinton's talk about if chev became president, applying military action if the iranians don't stick to this you. have your doubts. >> here's the deal. i worked the osama bin laden --