things. and allowing the government to regulate them. so the argument is that this is not about free speech and being able to express yourself online it's a functional actual thing that you're putting online and therefore the government has a right. what do you think to that? >> if the government makes that argument i would suspect that the response is that there are plenty of instructional things like textbooks or instruction manuals given the anarchist cookbook which is protected by the first amendment and taught people how to construct guns. there are plenty of similar instances where these instructional manuals have been found to have first amendment protection and just because we're dealing with something in a digital format in a new medium should not deny first amendment protection. >> and that's one of the arguments, rebecca, from specifically this young man who came up with the 3-d gun saying this is kinding after high profile shootings, the government's trying to crack