of doing the crime. >> correct. he was convicted, found guilty. the jury convict requested him in one hour. look, my mother used to beat me with a wooden spoon. does that mean i'm going to get away murder? in order to show ineffective assistance of counsel, you have to show that the trial outcome may have been different, but unfortunately for this guy in this case, it would have been harmless error. the evidence was overwhelming. and again, under texas law a mitigating factor has to have some nexus to the crime committed. i'm sorry, i think this guy's testimony and this evidence, and there's no evidence in the record as to why it wasn't presented. his lawyers may have made a decision that it wasn't going to make a difference one way or another or actually even hurt. jon: doesn't it amount to, you know, giving this guy a second bite at the apple, a second, you know, a second attempt to prove his case, john? >> no, john. listen, the attorneys didn't even look into his juvenile record. they received redacted records. they didn't bother to ask for the unredacted records.