>> go to michelle. it's pro/anti-fracking because they made a distinction. >> this is a free speech issue. this festival is subsidized by taxpayers. they got $60,000 from taxpayers. it's clearly a violation of free speech. if they are getting money from us and they are deciding which political agenda they want to put out there, that is what they're doing. they are endorsing a point of view and censoring another point of view. you don't think that is censorship? you don't think it's a violation of free speech? >> where do you fall on this? >> michelle should get a dictionary and look up what free speech is. but let's look at the facts here. we are talking about a private company that made a decision and we're saying that -- >> it's paid for by taxpayers. >> let me finish. let me finish. this is a bought and paid for commercial by the energy industry and the director lied about it -- >> no, no, no, no. >> he said it's not the case