to the new york times article over the weekend. an extensive analysis of the benghazi attack of 9/11 of which the new york times concluded there was no al qaeda connection among the militants that took part in the attack. let's bring in the panel. stephen hayes, kirsten powers and charles krathammer. stephen, let's start with you. you took this on in the new york standard said kirkpatrick did extensive reporting on the ground but missed on the big points. >> i think his reporting was in many respects terrific but the details that he provided about the inside of the mother's house of one of the chief suspects of the benghazi attacks, fantastic on the ground minute by minute reporting. where he made the mistake is drawing sweeping conclusions that weren't justified by his reporting or the body of evidence collected about the attacks since. and his main mistake was declaring in a kata gorical way