described the nsa program as increment nat and arbitrary invasion of privacy. the judge's ruling has been described as a significant legal setback for the nsa programs and went the last few minutes we had a response from the justice department saying they are reviewing the legal decision but there will be no immediate comment at this time upon it, shepard. >> do we know any specifics of what this means for the nsa surveillance programs? >> the judge writes there will be no met action, called a stay on the order because he expects the government to appeal. but the judge lays out a powerful case against the program, fighting the three connections rule which allows analysts to access the spider-web like reach of the phone numbers, with the judge offering as a hypothetical, a new york city resident tagged for review and one of the number his calls on a regular basis is domino's pizza, and under the three hop rule the nsa can now access all of the numbers connected to the domino's number over a five-year period, and the judge writes-the-scope of these