>> neil: you just made more than immaterial changes, right? you're structurally changing, delaying key provisions for a year, you're changing working requirements. you're more than tinkering. >> it's not -- all right. maybe not tinkering, but what happens is when the law becomes -- is executed, certain provisions weren't necessarily working out the way it was -- >> neil: this i kind of -- >> i think from a procedural standpoint there's nothing wrong with laws being amended when the purpose of the amendment is to make the law function better. we want the law to be in as good a shape as possible. >> neil: a big difference between amending something and completely changing it. >> if agree. the bigger problem are these delays. it shows the federal government really is not in a position to pass a law and then have the law work as soon as it's on the books. >> neil: beginning october 1st , all these