explanation, or a window for why she may have done what she did. >> you know, jon it's a curious decision on two counts. first, one of the big advantages that a prosecutor has is they get to have the last word, they get to have the last word summations, that is a tremendous advantage. in this case martinez not only would have had the last word in summation, he had president opportunity to deliver the last bit of testimony, remember the prosecutor's -- the prosecution's rebuttal case. instead what he did with respect to that is he opened the door to this borderline personality defense which then allowed the defense, or will allow the defense to bring on their own witnesses to rebut that. very curious decision particularly when the issue is her mental state and they have to prove that she had the mental state to to commit the murder. >> the state's evidence is overwhelming in this case. you didn't need this expert to come in and testify about what she did and it undercuts