one of the main problems the prosecutor had in upholding the conviction, what was the motive? the prosecution claimed some sex gone wild but there was no evidence of that. >> no evidence and don't forget, we can never forget, they were roommates and even that forensics was there, on the brush, the bra, all of that could be explained away by they're roommates and of course they're together. even if they put her in that place at the time, there was no proof at trial that she had anything to do with it and i don't see how at that gets better with time. >> megyn: but the bra clasp on which raphael's dna was supposed to be found, mark, didn't turn up until magically six weeks after the murder. and they scoured the crime scene, you tell me as a guy investigating the homicide scene, that's automatically suspect it doesn't show up until six weeks later? >> well, it is, but you know, you can articulate that, too, that you actually went back with more thorough search or an interrogation statement, you know, kind of pointed you