footprints or fingerprints or anything like that. you have a woman who ends up dead in a bathtub without any water. you have an investigation that was closed, shall we say, for strange reasons, within an hour and called an accident. then we have another wife that went missing after that. we have all these things. that is what a prosecutor does, jenna. a prosecutor puts up says brick by brick, little by little, we'll put it all together for the you juror remember, you get at the end. there will not be a one smoking gun. that is why it is a close case. jenna: the public doesn't know about some of the questionable circumstances. for example, it was related that stacey went to pastor seeing her husband arrive home in black clothing being worried herself. she told that to somebody. the big question, doug, back to hearsay in this case, is something like that admissible? if, it shouldn't be allowed? >> that is a really good point you made because this case is a classic textbook case they could teach you in law school focusing only on what is admissible in court