businesses. martha: is this line something that is going to resonate with voters do you think, andrea? >> i think it is a very potent arguement. in 2008, remember barack obama campaigned on the most sweeping ethics reform in history and the most transparent administration. we know he is awarded a lot of top bundlers like eric holder, like julius stankowski, who heads the fec with plum positions. bob has a point. a lot of presidents do this. the obama promised he wouldn't. his argument become two classes, the rich, middle class or the poor. and he is for the poor. actually he is for the rich when they are politically connected to him. so in america, basically means if you have money, you can be close to the president and his administration. if you're not on the right side of his politics though he will demonize you. that is what he is doing to business owners. martha: you make a good point. the president admitted this himself in recent interview, bob. i really thought i could