of the money. the crime here is "knowing" and "willing." she they got this to hearsay exception. the question is they kept present information of 2011 request for more money out because it wasn't relevant to the crime back then. >>randy: the bottom line the jury heard the word "gift." in this case the word "gift," means an acquittal because in this case the government must prove these were campaign corrections. so if there is a question as to whether or not they were even campaign contributions it is time to sit down, shut the lights off and go home. >>shepard: but it did not come from the woman who made the donation but from her lawyer so it is not the same as hearing it from her. >>randy: can you thought do it both way. >> with the gift, she is defining it, lawyer is beginning it, you have to let a jury decide, what do they think this is? not what one person described, what was the money?