could lead to irreversible changes to the planet, but chief washington correspondent jim angle tells us conceptics say the science between the theory is suspicious. >> critics say emails paint a picture of cherry picking research to make client change look worn it is. >> they showed the world that they've been conceal and manipulating data, involved in essentially a conspiracy. >> they seem to be wanting to bend the research toward their desired end and not be unbiased arbiters of the science. >> in the emails, scientists quibble with one another regarding accuracy, one says there's not rising temperatures in the tropics unless you accept one study and approach and discount a wealth of others. this is downright dangerous. we need to communicate the uncertainty and be honest. another email says, the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it, which for all our sakes might not be too