going to do it so i can profit, that is one of the biggest dangers. >> gregg: she may have a very good point. what if a juror on a particular case, and a lot of people thought this went on in the o. j. simpson case -- what if a goosies, you know what? if i reach a particular verdict in a particular way, it's more saleable for a book. i'll make more money. doesn't the right under the federal constitution of the accused to a fair trial trump the first amendment for jurors? >> that's why we have very competent, good lawyers and a legal system to weed out the bad seeds. that's also taking -- you're both assuming that one person will sway 11 other people. >> and they could! >> you could hang a jury, but -- >> gregg: the three jurors who collaborated on a book following the o. j. simpson not guilty verdict, robert? >> valid point, but we don't have that here yet. until i see people collaborating here, very rare. >> if they can profit from it,