exception. take libya and set it aside. because of the reasons that charles is pointing out. the white house would object to him saying war of whim. they would object to whim. but they formally object to war. they don't think it's a war, they don't think it's hostility. to libya is different. you have seen less i think the republican fleeing on afghanistan for instance. you have seen huntsman and romney trying to vit both ways. house of representatives, you have most republicans rhetorically supporting the president on afghanistan. think think if they felt if he was up for following the war and you would see the robust support for the war in afghanistan. i am not sure we have seen a hinge moment some subject. >> chris: let me quickly with you to finish up, does the splits within the republican party on libya, on afghanistan, does that take