this was something that was identified at the time. the question was whether you stick with the existing definition of income, which they did, or whether you rewrite the tax code and -- >> bill: that's what he said. he said it keeps him up at night. he's one of these guys that are crunching the numbers, trying to figure out what the cost is going to be, and it seems like these markers keep shifting every week. >> actually, this is an important point. the fact is that when the cbo scored this and the savings and the costs, they did take into account this provision. so the cost estimate cbo had took this into account. now, if you were to modify it, maybe you could get cost savings, but again, i want to stress, these individuals between the ages of 62 and 65, they're not high income individuals. i agree they shouldn't be on medicaid but they will therefore -- they will. >> bill: they will qualify for medicaid the way the law is now.