congress can't make us buy something we don't want. that's the arguments of the plaintiffs. the justice department, of course, defended this and said it's all the economy and congress can regulate the economy under the interstate commerce clause. >> so it's going forward with those two particulars, they threw out -- it's interesting, the judge referred to the democrats' argument as alice in wonderland as one point where, you know, they want it both ways. what's the difference between what happened here and what happened with that case in michigan where the judge there essentially wrote an opinion on the back of a napkin and it was about that long. >> right. this is a very scholarly opinion written -- >> the florida one. >> thank you. written by a very well respected judge. no disrespect to the judge in michigan. it was a very brief cursory opinion that basically said congress can regulate anything that affects interstate congress. even one person deciding not to buy health care which wouldn't even be a blip on the radar screen, if you added up all those individuals who decided in the aggregate there would be an effect on the economy and