about the dissenting judges, wasn't that fascinating, they rediscovered federalism. they found a right to privacy in the constitution in the ninth amendment but they can't find the plain words of the second empty. i got a kick out of that. megyn: do you think -- based on what i've covered of the supreme court, you can almost always tell how they're going to rule, it's not a surprise it was 5-4. how big a role -- we're watching this with kagan and trying to figure out is she a liberal. i think it's accepted according to the white house, even, she has this philosophy. let's say we don't know. is it their personal idea ology that's behind this decision on both sides? one side believes guns aren't so bad, and that people have the right to have them and one side believes as many liberals do guns are bad, and they need to be stopped. >> i think you're spot on with that. they'll find what they need to find in the law to further an agenda far too often. in this case, as i say, the minority, the dissenting justices all of the sudden said well, we've got to