result of that. but how was it covered in the mainstream media? let's get -- i want to get to the clip because i want to show this first one from abc news and how they covered that exact thing you were talking about. >> global warming naysayers are claiming that e-mails stolen from this research university show climate scientists discussing how to fudge results to promote the idea that humans are altering the planet. the science is solid, according to a vast majority of researchers with hotter temperatures, melting glaciers and rising sea levels providing the proof. >> naysayers, the words. they might as well be calling them the flat earth society. stolen data. look at the pejorative. no evidence of this. they dismiss it at the end by saying it's subtle science. by the way, it took abc 16 days before they did their first story on this. >> because it wasn't in the direction they wanted it.